'Employees are our biggest asset' is the most often heard phrase in corporate parlance and it is interestingly inserted to assert an enterprises' continued focus on building human / intellectual capital. It also becomes the focus when any cost cutting is discussed....the asset soon turns into a cost discussion.....this brings in the question....why are employees subjected to the perceived notion of a highly interchangeable component?
Exaggerated as it may sound at first sight.....it is a reality that dawns upon introspection. It is heart wrenching to hire the best possible talent and to let them go because of change in market forces, economic environment or improper business acumen. While the first two are not entirely controllable, the third is a serious human error which essentially derives information / indicators from the first two with a fair dose of fundamentals related to the business. The core (and this is my opinion) is to make HR a strategic part of growth than a mere support function.
The ground rules for hiring as set by HR will involve information gathering from all disciplines in a company - market opportunity, internal preparedness, budget availability, investment capability, competition scenario, leadership within the enterprise and the growth visibility for each individual who is hired. It is seldom an intensive practice to involve HR and assimilate all the above information to give a combined indicator for building intellectual / human capital.
The leadership can set a system to forewarn or possibly gauge the impending changes to the market environment.....mind you, this is easier said than done but a consistent process to review and assess builds in the immunity to withstand vagaries in the market dynamics. The leader can instill the sense of passion and motivation to achieve stretch targets......which helps contain the human numbers and possibly not be swayed by boom or be hit adversely by a crash.
In the end.....it is left to a leader, his vision and passion to retain the tag of an asset on his employees. It is his ability to demand and put to use various information at his disposal to make informed decisions. Well, this is my perspective.....am sure there are many other ways to look at it too.
Exaggerated as it may sound at first sight.....it is a reality that dawns upon introspection. It is heart wrenching to hire the best possible talent and to let them go because of change in market forces, economic environment or improper business acumen. While the first two are not entirely controllable, the third is a serious human error which essentially derives information / indicators from the first two with a fair dose of fundamentals related to the business. The core (and this is my opinion) is to make HR a strategic part of growth than a mere support function.
The ground rules for hiring as set by HR will involve information gathering from all disciplines in a company - market opportunity, internal preparedness, budget availability, investment capability, competition scenario, leadership within the enterprise and the growth visibility for each individual who is hired. It is seldom an intensive practice to involve HR and assimilate all the above information to give a combined indicator for building intellectual / human capital.
The leadership can set a system to forewarn or possibly gauge the impending changes to the market environment.....mind you, this is easier said than done but a consistent process to review and assess builds in the immunity to withstand vagaries in the market dynamics. The leader can instill the sense of passion and motivation to achieve stretch targets......which helps contain the human numbers and possibly not be swayed by boom or be hit adversely by a crash.
In the end.....it is left to a leader, his vision and passion to retain the tag of an asset on his employees. It is his ability to demand and put to use various information at his disposal to make informed decisions. Well, this is my perspective.....am sure there are many other ways to look at it too.
